The whole sorry Wolfowitz affair looks like it is finally drawing to a close.

It is hard to believe that he will stay on much longer at the World Bank, and it is time to start thinking more closely about the future of that institution. From the first, I was critical of the way he was chosen because I have long opposed the “old boy” agreement between the United States and Europe, by which the US always appoints the head of the World Bank and Europe the head of the IMF. This unspoken arrangement dates from the founding of the Bretton Woods institution at a time when colonialism was still alive, and makes no sense in the twenty-first century.
There are reports that European leaders have told the US that if they get Wolfowitz to step down quickly and quietly, they will be allowed to choose Wolfowitz’s successor. It’s easy to see why the US and Europe want to stick to business as usual, but such a deal would amount to a wasted opportunity. I can think of no better way to restore confidence in these two venerable institutions than to finally open up the way their presidents are selected and make the whole selection process transparent.
About IIPM ! IIPM Programmes ! IIPM Placement ! IIPM Alumni ! IIPM Alliances ! IIPM Ranking ! IIPM Director's Desk ! IIPM Dean's Message ! History of IIPM ! IIPM Mission ! IIPM Curriculum ! IIPM Project Based Learning ! IIPM GOTA ! IIPM Dual Specialisation ! IIPM Faculty ! IIPM GOP ! IIPM Campus Resources ! IIPM Campus Events ! IIPM Sports Club ! IIPM Support Services ! IIPM Campus ! IIPM Libraries ! IIPM Cafeteria ! IIPM Academic Centres ! IIPM Wilton Park Reports ! IIPM Feedback ! IIPM Links ! IIPM Sitemap ! Contact IIPM !
Labels: Accommodation, Diversification, Executive Education, FAQs, Highest ranked, Impressions, In-Company Programmes, Internationalisation, learning, Participants, Students
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home